AP Biology · Unit 3 · Lesson 07

Cellular Respiration
& the Currency of Life

DateOct 14, 2024
Period3rd · Block A
Duration90 min
Grade11–12
Instructor
Dr. Hollister
Room
Science 214
Enrollment
24 students
Prior Lesson
Photosynthesis
i.

Learning Objectives

1
Trace the flow of energy and carbon through glycolysis, the Krebs cycle, and oxidative phosphorylation.
2
Calculate theoretical ATP yield per glucose molecule and account for differences under aerobic versus anaerobic conditions.
3
Model the electron transport chain as a proton-pumping, chemiosmotic system driving ATP synthase.
4
Design and execute a controlled experiment measuring CO₂ production in germinating peas across temperature conditions.
ii.

Materials & Preparation

iii.

Lesson Flow — 90 Minutes

0:0010 min
Warm-Up · Bell Ringer

The Apple & the Marathon Runner

Projected prompt as students arrive: "A marathon runner eats an apple at mile 20. Ninety minutes later, how many of the carbon atoms from that apple are still in her body — and where did the rest go?"

  • Students respond silently in notebooks (3 min), then pair-share (4 min)
  • Cold-call two pairs; chart predictions on board without correcting
0:1025 min
Direct Instruction · Mini-Lecture

Three Stages, One Molecule of Glucose

Annotated sketch of the mitochondrion on the board. Students complete guided notes as each stage is unpacked. Emphasize that cellular respiration is controlled combustion — the same chemistry as fire, staged across dozens of enzymes.

α

Glycolysis

Cytoplasm. Glucose (6C) splits into two pyruvate (3C). Substrate-level phosphorylation. Anaerobic — the oldest pathway.

Net + 2 ATP · 2 NADH
β

Krebs Cycle

Mitochondrial matrix. Acetyl-CoA fed in; carbon exits as CO₂. Electron carriers loaded for the main event.

+ 2 ATP · 6 NADH · 2 FADH₂
γ

Oxidative Phos.

Inner membrane. ETC pumps H⁺; chemiosmosis drives ATP synthase. O₂ is the final electron acceptor — hence aerobic.

~ 28 ATP · H₂O
0:3535 min
Lab Investigation · Groups of Four

Respiration Rate in Germinating Peas

Teams compare CO₂ production in germinating versus dormant seeds at two temperatures. Goal: produce a defensible rate (ppm CO₂ per minute per gram) and explain any deviation from predictions.

  1. Mass 20 g of germinating peas; place in chamber A with CO₂ probe.
  2. Repeat with 20 g of dormant peas (chamber B) as the control.
  3. Record baseline CO₂ concentration; sample every 30 s for 5 minutes.
  4. Submerge chamber A in 10 °C bath; repeat 5-minute trial.
  5. Graph ppm CO₂ vs. time; calculate slope of the linear region.
  6. Normalize rate per gram of tissue; share results to class data sheet.
Class Data · Pooled

Expected Ranges

ConditionRateσ
Germ. 25 °C1.800.22
Germ. 10 °C0.640.14
Dormant 25 °C0.080.04
Glass beads0.010.01

Units: ppm CO₂ · min⁻¹ · g⁻¹. Use to triangulate group findings.

1:1015 min
Synthesis & Debrief

Whiteboard Meeting — Claim, Evidence, Reasoning

Each group posts one claim linking their temperature result to enzyme kinetics, supported by a specific data point. Class evaluates whether the evidence actually supports the claim, or merely correlates. Return to the morning's apple prompt — students revise predictions in blue ink.

1:255 min
Closure · Exit Ticket

Two Questions, Two Minutes

  • Explain why cyanide (an ETC inhibitor) kills faster than a glycolysis inhibitor.
  • One question you still have about chemiosmosis.
iv.

Assessment Strategy

15 PTS

Lab Report

Summative · Due Friday

Formal CER write-up with graphed data, error analysis, and a paragraph connecting observed CO₂ rates to Q₁₀ and enzyme theory.

5 PTS

Exit Ticket

Formative · Today

Scored for accuracy on the cyanide question; student-generated questions drive Wednesday's opening review.

Observation

Diagnostic · Ongoing

Circulating rubric notes probe-handling technique, group discourse quality, and willingness to revise initial predictions.